3/17/2024 0 Comments Far cry 3 dingo iconWhen I write ‘tested’, I am referring to the testing of an hypothesis. I’ve never met a scientist who would be capable of doing this, let alone who would want to.īut this doesn’t necessarily prove my claim that it is ‘impossible’. Most importantly, the idea that a conspiracy could form among scientists ignores one of the most fundamental components of scientific progress - dissension and bloody hell, can we dissent! The scientific approach is one where successive lines of evidence testing hypotheses are eventually amassed into a concept, then perhaps a rule of thumb. We can barely keep our own shit together than try to construct a water-tight conspiracy. First, most scientists are just not that organised, nor do they have the time to get together to plan such elaborate practical jokes on the public. There are three main reasons why conspiracies among scientists are impossible. Whether it’s about climate change, pharmacology, genetically modified organisms or down-to-earth environmentalism, people who don’t want to agree with a particular scientific finding often invoke the conspiracy argument. We’ve all heard it somewhere before: “It’s all just a big conspiracy and those bloody scientists are just trying to protect their funding sources.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |